In the aftermath of the tragic events of September 11th, 2001, the United States government underwent a dramatic transformation in its approach to national security. The fear and uncertainty that gripped the nation in the wake of the attacks led to the implementation of aggressive counterterrorism measures, with the goal of preventing another large-scale terror attack on American soil.
However, as journalist Spencer Ackerman argues in his recent article for The Intercept, this response had unintended consequences that have had a lasting impact on the country. In particular, Ackerman focuses on the transformation of two agencies, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), into what he calls “death squads,” and the role that the politics of counterterrorism played in this disturbing evolution.
Ackerman begins by highlighting the language used by the government to justify its aggressive approach to counterterrorism. He notes that the term “terrorist” has become a weaponized label, used to justify any and all actions deemed necessary in the name of national security. This has allowed ICE and CBP to operate with a level of impunity, shielded from scrutiny and accountability.
The author then delves into the history of both ICE and CBP, tracing their origins to the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in the wake of 9/11. He argues that from their inception, these agencies were designed to be “unreformable,” with a mandate to prioritize national security above all else. This, combined with an influx of funding and resources, created a dangerous and unchecked power dynamic within the agencies.
Ackerman goes on to detail numerous examples of the abuses of power and human rights violations committed by ICE and CBP in the name of counterterrorism. From the separation of families at the border to the countless deaths of individuals in immigration detention, he paints a disturbing picture of agencies that have strayed far from their original purpose of protecting the country.
The author also addresses the issue of accountability, or lack thereof, within these agencies. He highlights the numerous attempts to reform ICE and CBP over the years, all of which have ultimately been unsuccessful. He argues that the very structure and culture of these agencies make it nearly impossible for any meaningful change to occur, leaving them free to continue operating with impunity.
Ackerman concludes his article by calling for a complete reevaluation of the way the United States approaches counterterrorism. He argues that the fear and rhetoric that have fueled the aggressive tactics of ICE and CBP must be replaced with a more thoughtful and measured approach. He also calls for greater oversight and accountability for these agencies, as well as a reexamination of their mandates and priorities.
In the end, Ackerman’s article serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers of allowing fear to dictate our actions. The transformation of ICE and CBP into “death squads” is a chilling example of how the politics of counterterrorism can have devastating consequences. It is time for a change in approach, one that prioritizes human rights and accountability over blind nationalism and fear. Only then can we truly claim to be a nation that values freedom and justice for all.
