The fashion industry has always been known for its exclusivity and narrow standards of beauty. However, in recent years, there has been a promising shift towards inclusivity and diversity in the industry. Many designers and brands have embraced the idea of size inclusivity, creating clothing for a wider range of body types. This progress has been celebrated by many, but unfortunately, it seems that we are now witnessing a decline in this movement. Designer Ester Manas, known for her bold and inclusive designs, has recently spoken out about this disappointing trend.
In an interview with a leading fashion magazine, Manas expressed her disappointment with the current state of the fashion industry. She believes that the recent decline in size inclusivity is not only disappointing but also short-sighted. As a designer who has always championed inclusivity, Manas is deeply concerned about the impact this could have on the industry and society as a whole.
One of the main reasons for this decline, according to Manas, is the pressure from the media and society to conform to a certain body type. The rise of social media has only amplified this pressure, with influencers and celebrities promoting a narrow and unrealistic standard of beauty. This has created a toxic environment where people feel the need to constantly compare themselves to others and strive for an unattainable ideal. As a result, many fashion brands have reverted to their old ways, catering only to a limited range of sizes.
This shift towards exclusivity not only goes against the progress made in recent years but also ignores the fact that the average size of women in the US and UK is a size 16. This means that a large portion of the population is being excluded from the fashion industry. Manas believes that this is not only unfair but also a missed opportunity for brands to tap into a growing market and cater to the needs of their diverse customer base.
Moreover, Manas argues that the decline in size inclusivity is also short-sighted from a business perspective. Inclusivity sells. The success of brands like Savage X Fenty and Good American, which offer a wide range of sizes, is a testament to this. These brands have not only gained a loyal customer base but have also received praise for their commitment to inclusivity. In contrast, brands that continue to exclude larger sizes risk losing customers and damaging their reputation.
But beyond the business aspect, Manas believes that the lack of size inclusivity in the fashion industry has a much deeper impact on society. By promoting a narrow standard of beauty, the industry is perpetuating harmful beauty standards and contributing to the body image issues that many people, especially women, struggle with. This can have serious consequences on mental health and self-esteem. By embracing size inclusivity, the fashion industry has the power to promote body positivity and diversity, which can have a positive impact on society as a whole.
Manas also points out that size inclusivity is not just about offering a wider range of sizes, but also about representation. It is important for people of all sizes to see themselves represented in the media and the fashion industry. This not only promotes inclusivity but also helps to break down harmful stereotypes and promote body diversity.
In conclusion, the recent decline in size inclusivity in the fashion industry is disappointing and short-sighted. It goes against the progress made in recent years and ignores the needs and diversity of the customer base. As a designer, Ester Manas urges the industry to embrace inclusivity and diversity, not only for the sake of business but also for the well-being of society. It is time for the fashion industry to move away from exclusivity and towards a more inclusive and positive future.
