In a recent shocking revelation, it has been reported that the U.S. military killed survivors of a boat strike for not surrendering correctly. This disturbing incident has raised serious questions about the actions of the U.S. military and their adherence to international laws and regulations.
According to sources, before ordering a second strike on the boat, Admiral Frank Bradley sought legal advice from JSOC’s top lawyer, Colonel Cara Hamaguchi. This indicates that the U.S. military was aware of the legal implications of their actions and yet chose to proceed with the strike.
The incident in question took place in the Arabian Sea in 2012, where a U.S. Navy ship came across a small fishing boat carrying 15 people. The Navy ship, believing the boat to be a threat, opened fire and killed one person. The remaining survivors were then ordered to surrender, but when they did not comply, a second strike was ordered, resulting in the deaths of all the remaining passengers.
This incident has sparked outrage and condemnation from human rights organizations and experts, who have called for a thorough investigation into the matter. The fact that the U.S. military resorted to such extreme measures without proper justification or protocol is deeply concerning.
In a statement, Colonel Hamaguchi said that the U.S. military has a responsibility to protect its personnel and assets, and that they followed all necessary procedures before ordering the second strike. However, this explanation does not justify the loss of innocent lives and the violation of international laws.
The U.S. military’s actions in this incident also raise questions about their training and protocols. It is alarming to think that the military personnel involved in this incident were not equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to handle such situations in a more humane and lawful manner.
Furthermore, the U.S. military’s actions have also caused harm to their own reputation and credibility. The United States is known for its strong stance on human rights and the rule of law, and incidents like these only serve to tarnish that image.
It is imperative that the U.S. military takes responsibility for their actions and conducts a thorough investigation into this incident. They must also take steps to ensure that such incidents do not occur in the future. This includes providing proper training to their personnel on how to handle similar situations and adhering to international laws and regulations.
In the aftermath of this incident, it is also important for the U.S. government to address the issue of accountability. The families of the victims deserve justice and compensation for their loss. The U.S. government must take responsibility for the actions of their military and provide closure to the families of the victims.
In conclusion, the U.S. military’s decision to kill survivors of a boat strike for not surrendering correctly is a grave violation of international laws and a stain on their reputation. It is crucial that they take immediate steps to address this issue and prevent such incidents from happening in the future. The lives of innocent civilians must not be taken lightly, and the U.S. military must be held accountable for their actions.
