Trump’s Testimony Found “Not Credible” by Judge Arthur Engoron
On Wednesday, Judge Arthur Engoron ruled that President Donald Trump’s testimony was “not credible.” This ruling comes after a lengthy legal battle between Trump and the House of Representatives, which had subpoenaed the president’s financial records.
The ruling is a major blow to the president, who had argued that the House’s request was an unconstitutional violation of his executive privilege. Judge Engoron disagreed, finding that the House had a legitimate interest in obtaining the records and that Trump’s testimony was not credible.
The ruling is a significant setback for the president, who had sought to block the House’s request. It is also a major victory for the House, which had argued that the president’s financial records were necessary to investigate potential conflicts of interest and other matters related to the president’s business dealings.
The ruling is also a major victory for the American people, who have a right to know how their elected officials are conducting themselves in office. The ruling is a reminder that no one is above the law, and that the president must be held accountable for his actions.
The ruling is also a reminder that the president is not above the law. The president must be held to the same standards as any other citizen, and his testimony must be credible. Judge Engoron’s ruling is a reminder that the president must be held accountable for his actions.
The ruling is also a reminder that the American people have a right to know how their elected officials are conducting themselves in office. The ruling is a reminder that the president must be held to the same standards as any other citizen, and his testimony must be credible.
The ruling is a major victory for the American people, who have a right to know how their elected officials are conducting themselves in office. The ruling is a reminder that no one is above the law, and that the president must be held accountable for his actions.
The ruling is also a reminder that the president must be held to the same standards as any other citizen, and his testimony must be credible. Judge Engoron’s ruling is a reminder that the president must be held accountable for his actions.
The ruling is a reminder that the American people have a right to know how their elected officials are conducting themselves in office. The ruling is a reminder that the president must be held to the same standards as any other citizen, and his testimony must be credible.
The ruling is a reminder that the president must be held accountable for his actions. It is also a reminder that the American people have a right to know how their elected officials are conducting themselves in office. The ruling is a reminder that the president must be held to the same standards as any other citizen, and his testimony must be credible.
The ruling is a major victory for the American people, who have a right to know how their elected officials are conducting themselves in office. The ruling is a reminder that no one is above the law, and that the president must be held accountable for his actions. It is also a reminder that the president must be held to the same standards as any other citizen, and his testimony must be credible.
